I have had an increase in the number of inquiries about using FSM to treat the eye. My response is always the same and I want to have everyone know it so I’ll put it here on the blog.  

Non opthalmic professionals should not treat the eye with FSM or any other modality. Non-othalmic professionals do not have the equipment or the expertise to examine and evaluate the eye. Microcurrent and FSM have not been shown officially to be useful or safe in treating the eye and TENS devices are contraindicated for use through the eye. There is no reason to expect that FSM is not safe and opthalmic professionals can use any modality they deem safe and worth a trial of treatment. We have mouse research showing that one frequency combination can reduce inflammation. To the extent that reducing inflammation is useful in treating anything that frequency may be helpful.

Dr. Richard Luekenga is an optometrist using FSM to treat the eye successfully. He practices in Richfield Utah and his number is (435) 896-8142. We are referring patients and practitioners to him for consult and advice. The case reports are promising but they are just case reports at this point. FSM is in a vulnerable position in this clinical area. If non-qualified practitioners treat the eye with FSM and patients have trouble or side effects - whether actually related to treatment or simply coincidental - FSM gets a bad reputation and the practitioner is at risk - not to mention the patient.

If you are not an opthalmic professional do not treat the eye with FSM. Prudently yours - Dr. Carol

Dr. Carol’s blog is live! On these blog pages, you will be able to get a glimpse into the thoughts of Dr. Carol, read about exciting announcements from FSM, or get the response to a question. Do you have something you would like Dr. Carol to respond to in a blog? Email her at askcarol@frequencyspecific.com