NGOK CHENG, M.D., HARRY VAN HOOF, M.D., EMMANUEL BOCKX, M.D., MICHEL J. HOOGMARTENS, M.D.,* JOSEPH C. MULIER, M.D.,* WILLIAM DE LOECKER, M.D. FRANS J.DE DIJCKER, PH.D.,** WILLY M. SANSEN, PH.D.,** AND WILLIAM DE LOECKER, M.D.
Some of the most important electrical changes occurring in living tissues are (1) piezoelectricity, a stress-generated p~tential,~*’~’~’,~~-*~,~’ (2) pyroelectricity provoked by heating biop~lymers,’~ and (3) streaming potentials caused by the movement of charged 1iq~ids.I~ Biologic systems are known to be greatly affected by electrical treatment. The growth in higher plants can be stimulated by the application of an electric field,” and in vitro applied currents may inhibit bacterial growth.35 The application of an electric or an electromagnetic field to various biologic systems results in stimulation of growth and tissue re~air.~ In vivo electromagnetic treatment of bone tissue improves oste~genesis,~’~~~ and has been used in the treatment of and congenital pseudarthrosis.x,28 Electrical potentials also stimulate the regeneration of damaged nerve and muscle structures34 and accelerate surgical wound healing. 1,9 Electrical stimulation has even been used to treat skin decubitus~lcers.~~.~~ Important advances have been made in the analysis of bioelectricity, particularly by clinical experimentation. Inasmuch as the biologic aspect of bioelectricity has still been insufficiently explored, an attempt is made to analyze and explain some of the biochemical effects that occur in skin tissue during in vitro treatment by electric current.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The skin of locally inbred, male Wistar R rats, just finishing their first hair-cycle at 21 days of age, was used. In these circumstances, metabolism of the skins was in rest phase. After removing the hair of the back by plucking and disinfection with 0.05% chlorhexidine (ICI), the skin samples, measuring approximately 5 X 6 cm and 0.5 mm in thickness, were isolated and the subcutaneous fat and connective tissue removed with a scalpel. This tissue was longitudinally cut in two equal parts; one part was electrically stimulated, and the other served as a nontreated control. Either the entire skin flap was used or the tissue was partially cut in longitudinal strips (3-5 mm wide), remaining attached at both ends to the communal tissue base. The skin samples were slightly clamped at both ends between adjustable platinum or stainless steel plate or wire electrodes fixed on a Perspex frame. This entire system, placed in an appropriate plastic container, was submerged in KrebsRinger bicarbonate buffer, pH 7.4, containing 100,000 U of penicillin, 100 mg of streptomycin, and 20 mg of gentamycin/ 100 ml buffer. Direct electric currents varying from 1 pA to 30,000 pamp, were applied for up to four hours at a constant temperature of 37″. The direct current was produced by a locally constructed transistorized current source supplied by two 9-V batteries (Duracell, Mallory, England) and potentiometrically regulated (Fig. 1). The total electrical resistance of skin was estimated as a function of the various currents applied, using the four-point measurement technique.36 The cross-sectional area of the medium orthogonal to the current direction was 20 cm2. To follow the incorporation of amino acids into the proteins, 40 pCi of [2-I4C]glycine (specific activity, 48.9 mCi/mmol; The Radiochemical Centre, Amersham, England), L-[U- ”C]alanine (specific activity 150 mCi/mmol), or ~-[U-‘~C]isoleucine (specific activity 300 mCi/ mmol) was added to 100 ml of buffer. The intracellular specific activities of the added amino acids were determined after tissue homogenization by automatic amino acid analysis.” By the addition of I00 pCi of [6-3H]thymidine (specific activity, 8 Ci/mmol) to 100 ml of buffer, the incorporation into DNA was measured, while with 40 pCi of a[ 1 -14C]aminoisobutyric acid (specific activity, 60 mCi/mmol) the amino acid transport through the cell membrane was estimated. In a series of experiments, the possible effects of negative protein balance were avoided by adding to the incubation medium 4 ml of an L-amino acid-glucose mixture/ 100 ml Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer (Vamin-glucose, Vitrum, Stockholm 12).12 To detect a possible latent effect of electrical stimulation, an initial electrical stimulation for 30-240 minutes in buffer without radioactive precursors present was followed by a subsequent incubation during two hours at 37″ in fresh KrebsRinger bicarbonate buffer containing the appropriate tracers. This second incubation occurred without any accompanying electrical treatment. The control samples did not receive any electricity but otherwise were treated identically. After incubation. the skin samples were cut in portions of 200 mg and prepared for liquid scintillation counting as previously described.” The radioactivity incorporated into the proteins and into DNA, or taken up by the cells, was expressed as disintegrations per minute (dpm). Adenosine-5’-triphosphate (ATP) concentrations in controls and electrostimulated skin samples were assayed after incubation. The tissue (200 mg) was submerged in liquid nitrogen and in a deep-cooled steel mortar at -196″, reduced to a fine powder with the addition of 0.2 ml of 0.9 M perchloric acid (HCIO,, Merck). After the further addition of 1.8 ml of HC104, ATP extraction took place overnight at 2″. After centrifugation for 20minutes at 12,000 X g, the precipitate was again washed with 2 ml of 0.2 M HCIO4, and the supernatants were combined. The pH was adjusted with 2 M KOH to 6.8-7.4 and the KClO4 precipitate removed. After dilution with Tris-EDTA buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.75) the ATP concentrations were measured by the luciferin-luciferase reaction (LKB, Wallac, Luminometer 1 250).29 Standard errors of the mean and p values, employing Student’s t-test, were calculated.
On dry rat skin, the electrical resistance was established by the four-point measurement te~hnique.~~ Its value, Rs, was high and decreased linearly with the applied current up to 50 pA (Fig. 2A). At higher currents, the resistance leveled off, to the point at which tissue destruction occurred. The electrical resistance of skin submerged in buffer was considerably reduced, as only a fraction of the applied current passed through the tissue. Indeed, the total electrical resistance between the two electrodes was modeled by a combination of four resistances, twice the electrode-skin resistance, which was by far the largest, and the parallel combination of the resistance of the skin (Rs) and the buffer
The electrode-skin resistances were mainly the result of polarization of the electrode-skin interfaces. The values of the resistances RB and Rs could be separated from the electrode-skin resistances by the four-point technique (Fig. 2A). At low currents, the current through the skin was about one-sixth of that through the buffer (Fig. 2B). At currents exceeding 50 PA, however, the currents through the skin were limited to about 6 pA, whereas the current through RB kept rising as a function of the applied currents. During incubation, the intracellular specific radioactivity in the total free glycine pool determined after amino acid analysis of the homogenized tissue amounted to 0.035 pCi/pmol. I’ The [2-I4C]glycine incorporation into the skin proteins was significantly
stimulated by a constant electric current varying from 10 pA to 1000 PA. The highest stimulatory effects were obtained with 50 pA to 1000 pA, with glycine incorporation increased by as much as 75% compared with nontreated controls. Higher current intensities, exceeding 1000 pA, inhibited the protein synthesis by as much as 50% with currents of 1.5 X lo4 PA. An analogous pattern was obtained when the a-[ 1 -‘4C]aminoisobutyric acid uptake through the cell membrane was examined. Constant currents from 100 pA to 500 pA increased the transported amino acid analog by 30%-40% above control levels. Stimulation with higher intensities reduced the a-aminoisobutyric acid uptake. With currents of 1 X lo4 pA and of 3 X lo4 PA, the a-aminoisobutyric acid uptake was reduced to 73% and 20%, respectively, of the control values (Table 1). After the addition to the incubation medium of a mixture of L-amino acids, the absolute glycine incorporation values and amino isobutyric acid uptake increased. The electrostimulation had resulted in a stimulatory effect even more pronounced than that observed in buffer without amino acid supplement. Treatment with 100 pA increased the glycine incorporation by 72% (p < 0.001) and the a-aminoisobutyric acid uptake by 41% (p < 0.001) above the nontreated control values. Electrostimulation with 500 pA increased the glycine incorporation by 123% (p < 0.001) and the a-aminoisobutyric acid uptake by 90% (p < 0.001) (Table 2). Because electrical treatment during the incubation with [2-‘4Cjglycine was prolonged, the stimulatory effects observed with 500 pA became progressively more pronounced, amounting to 85% above control levels after an incubation period of four hours (Table 3). The effects of electrical treatment in skin incubated in Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer containing other amino acids, e.g., L-[U- ”C]isoleucine or ~-[U-‘~C]alanine, were analogous to those observed after incubation with [2-I4C]glycine. The stimulatory effects of electric currents on the protein synthesizing activity began at 10 pA, while the amino isobutyric acid uptake only became evident after treatment with 100 pA. With increasing electric currents, the inhibitory effect on a-amino isobutyric acid appeared at 750 PA, while glycine incorporation was still stimulated after treatment with 1000 pA (Fig. 4). These results were identical during staticincubation or after constant shaking of the medium. The [6-3H]thymidine incorporation into DNA of skin tissue was not affected by treatment with various constant electric currents. To detect a possible latent effect of electrical stimulation, skin tissue was treated with direct currents varying from Ipamp to 1 X lo4 pamp in Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer for up to 240 minutes without labeled precursors present. This initial incubation was followed by a second incubation without any electrical treatment for one or two hours in buffer containing either [2-I4C]glycine, a-[ 1 -14C]aminoisobutyric acid, or [6-3H]- thymidine. The uptake of radioactive tracers was never affected by any previous electrical treatment, eliminating the possibility of a latent effect. The electrical stimulation of protein synthesizing activity and of amino acid transport through the cell membrane only occurred when the skin was attached to both electrodes. Skin tissue flaps attached to one electrode only, with the other end freely floating in the buffer toward the second electrode, were not affected by electrical stimulation (Table 4). Electrostimulation of the tissue resulted in remarkably increased ATP concentrations. With currents from 50 pA to 1000 pA, the ATP levels were increased threefold to fivefold. With currents from 100 pA to 500 pA, the stimulatory effects were similar. With currents exceeding 1000 pA, the ATP concentration leveled, and with 5000 pA, they even were reduced slightly as compared with the nontreated controls (Table 5).
Minimum current intensities of approximately 50 pA are necessary to obtain a maximal stimulatory effect on protein synthesis. When higher currents are applied, the current passing through the skin does not increase significantly. These stimulatory effects are maintained to a level of approximately 1000 pA. The application of a specific current implies that only a small fraction is responsible for the metabolic effects. This is particularly noticeable with skin that is attached on one side only to an electrode, with the other end floating freely in the buffer. In this system, the skin is not affected by the electric currents, which obviously only pass through the buffer from one electrode to the other. Possible electrolytic effects are negligible with the smaller currents. Only when high currents, above 1000 PA, are applied, may electrolysis adversely affect metabolism. Although electrolysis depends on the voltage changes, it is not expected to occur in this system, because the voltages measured at the interfaces never exceed 1.5 V with the platinum and stainless steel electrodes. Constant shaking of the medium or static incubation of the skin does not affect the metabolic results, indicating that interference by accumulated electrolyte products is not probable. When the relatively low amino acid incorporation values are considered in function of the intracellular specific radioactivity, the glycine incorporation becomes even more significant, thereby proving this skin system a viable preparation. ”,I2 The stimulatory effect of direct current on amino acid incorporation into proteins precedes and exceeds the effects on amino acid transport as expressed by the .[ 1 -14C]aminoisobutyric acid uptake. This metabolically inactive amino acid analog is actively concentrated in the cells and transported through the membranes by the same camer as gly~ine.’~.~~ With higher currents, the inhibitory effects are first observed on amino acid transport, which is more drastically affected than protein synthesis. Electrostimulation seems to increase protein synthesizing activity primarily and independently, although subsequent stimulation of amino acid transport results in an additional increase in the amino acid incorporation into the proteins. Inasmuch as these effects only occur during the application of the current, without any latent effects, electrical stimulation directly affects protein metabolism, which even receives an additional impulse from the increased availability of free amino acids. The addition of a supplement of amino acids to the incubation buffer accentuates the stimulatory effects of electric current on metabolism. DNA metabolism is not affected by electrical stimulation, suggesting that the stimulatory and inhibitory effects on protein synthesizing activity occur independently of an effect on transcriptional processes. The metabolic stimulation persists as long as the tissue remains viable. When incubation is prolonged, the incorporation values level indicating structural damage to the ti~sue.~’ Electrical treatment has been observed to stimulate in vitro growth of the epiphyseal plate of rats, as well as protein synthesis in mature nucleated frog erythrocytes without affecting DNA metab~lism.~~~~~~~’~~~ An increased ATP generation also occurs in chloroplasts subjected to an artificial electrical potential difference induced by an external electric field.4i An artificial proton gradient across the functional membrane, created by acid-base transition, results in ATP formation in chloropla~ts.~~ These results support the chemiosmotic theory of Mitchell.3033i The stimulatory effects of electric current on ATP formation in skin tissue also can be explained by this principle. During electrostimulation, the electrons react with water molecules at the cathodic side to produce hydroxyl ions, while at the anodic side, protons are formed. Thus, between the anodic and cathodic interface, a proton gradient and a potential gradient across the tissue and the medium are created. Hence, protons under the influence of the electric field and the concentration difference should move from anode to cathode. Since the rate of proton formation at the anodic interface is equal to the rate of proton consumption at the cathodic interface, the net pH of the system, medium and tissue, remains undisturbed. As the migrating protons reach the mitochondrial membrane-bound H+-ATPase, ATP will be f~rmed.~~?~’ Substrate oxidation, which is accompanied by proton migration across the membranes, may equally be stimulated by the electrically induced proton current, acting in a feedback manner. This view, however, does not exclude the contribution of other factors or, possibly, specific receptor systems to the final effects. A latent effect of current treatment never has been observed. As on interruption of the current, the proton movement ceases and the reversible ATPase system is able to restore equilibrium. Insofar as protein synthesis depends on adequate ATP levels, the increased ATP production is partially responsible for the increased protein ~ynthesis.~~,’~ Another factor resulting in the increased protein synthesis is the amino acid availability, which is equally increased due to the stimulated amino acid transport. The electrical effects on amino acid transport through the cell membranes also may be mediated by changes in transmural potential differences modifying ionic fluxes and trans- ~ort.~’,~~ Although protein synthesis and amino acid transport are both stimulated, the mechanisms of action by which electric current exerts its effects differ.
Direct electric currents ranging from 10 pA to 1000 pA increase ATP concentrations in the tissue and stimulate amino acid incorporation into the proteins of rat skin. The amino acid transport through the cell membrane, followed by the a-aminoisobutyric acid uptake, is stimulated between 100 pA and 750 pA. The stimulatory effects on ATP production and on amino acid transport, apparently mediated by different mechanisms, contribute to the final increased protein synthesizing activity. DNA metabolism followed by thymidine incorporation remains unaffected during the course of current application. The effects on ATP production can be explained by proton movements on the basis of the chemiosmotic theory of Mitchell, while the transport functions are controlled by modifications in the electrical gradients across the membranes.
The authors are indebted to the Belgian National Foundation for Medical Research (F.G.W.O.) for a grant to the laboratory. I. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.
Assimacopoulos, D.: Wound healing promotion by the use of negative electric current. Am. J. Surg. 34423, 1968. Bassett, C. A. L.: Biological significance of piezoelectricity. A review. Calcif. Tissue Res. I :252, 1968. Bassett, C. A. L.: The effect of electrostatic fields on macromolecular synthesis by fibroblasts in vitro. J. Cell Biol. 39:9a, 1968. Bassett, C. A. L., Pawluk, R. J., and Pilla, A. A.: Augmentation of bone repair by inductively coupled electromagnetic fields. Science 184:575, 1974. Bozoky, L., Kiszely, G., Hoffman, T. A,, and Ladik, J.: Effect of electrostatic fields on cell mitosis. Nature 199: 1306, 1963. Brighton, C. T., Cronkey, J. E., and Osteman, A. L.: In vitro epiphyseal-plate growth in various constant electrical fields. J. Bone Joint Surg. %A397 I, 1976. Brighton, C. T., Friedenberg, Z. B., Mitchell, E. I., and Booth, R. E.: Treatment of nonunion with constant direct current. Clin. Orthop. 124:106, 1977. Brighton, C. T., Friedenberg, Z. B., Zemsky, L. M., and Pollis, P. R.: Direct-current stimulation of nonunion and congenital pseudarthrosis. J. Bone Joint Surg. 57A: 368, 1975. Constable, J. D., Scapicchio, A. P., and Opitz, B.: Studies of the effects of diapulse treatment of various aspects of wound healing in experimental animals. J. Surg. Res. 11:254, 1971. De Loecker, W., De Wever, F., Jullet, R., and Stas, M. L.: Metabolic changes in rat skin during preservation and storage in glycerol buffer at – 196 C. Cryobiology I3:24, 1976. De Loecker, W., and Stas, M. L.: Effect of cortisol treatment on free amino acid levels in rats. J. Endocrinol. 5957, 1973. De Loecker, W., Stas, M. L., De Wever, F., and Jullet, R.: The effects of cortisol and amino acids on the metabolic activity of rat skin stored in dimethylsulfoxide buffer at – 196°C. Cryobiology 15: 59, 1978. Eriksson, C.: Streaming potentials and other water-dependent effects in mineralized tissues. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 238:321, 1974. Eriksson, C.: Electrical properties of bone. In Bourne, G. H. (ed.): Biochemistry and Physiology of Bone, vol. 4. New York, Academic Press, 1976, pp. 329- 384. Florey, W., and Neuhaus, 0. W.: Induced transport of amino acids in rat liver after whole body y irradiation. Radiat. Res. 68: 138, 1976. Friedenberg, Z. B., Harlow, M. C., and Brighton, C. T.: Healing of nonunion of the medial malleolus by means of direct current: A case report. Trauma I1:883, 1971. Fukada, E.: Piezoelectric properties of organic polymers. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 238:7, 1974. Fukada, E., and Yasuda, I.: On the piezoelectric effect of bone. J. Phys. SOC. Jpn. 12:1158, 1957. Gensler, W.: Bioelectric potentials and their relation to growth in higher plants. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 238:280, 1974. Hanington, D. B., and Becker, R. 0.: Electrical stimulation of RNA and protein synthesis in the frog erythrocyte. Exp. Cell Res. 76:95, 1973. Hanington, D. B., Meyer, R., and Klein, R. M.: Effects of small amounts of electric current at the cellular level. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 238:300, 1974. Hubel, K. A.: The effects of electrical field stimulation and tetrodotoxin on ion transport by isolated rabbit ileum. J. Clin. Invest. 62:1039, 1977. Jagendorf, A. T., and Uribe, E.: ATP formation caused by acid-base transition of spinach chloroplasts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 55:170, 1966. Kaziro, Y .: The role of guanosine-5’-triphosphate in polypeptide chain elongation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 505:95, 1978. Keller, F. B., and Zamecnik. P. D.: The effects of guanosine diphosphate and triphosphate on the incorporation of labeled amino acids into proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 221:45, 1956. Korostoff, E.: Stress generated potentials in bone: Relationship to piezoelectricity of collagen. J. Biomech. 10:41, 1977. Lanyon, L. E., and Hartman, W.: Strain-related electrical potentials recorded in vitro and in vivo. Calcif. Tissue Res. 22:3 15, 1977. Lavine, L. S., Lustrin, I., and Shamos, M. H.: Treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia with direct current. Clin. Orthop. 124:69, 1977. 29. Lundin, A,, and Thore, A.: Analytical information obtainable by evaluation of the time course of firefly bioluminescence in the assay of ATP. Anal. Biochem. 66:47, 1975. 30. Mitchell, P.: Chemiosmotic coupling in oxidative and photosynthetic phosphorylation. Biol. Rev. 41:445, 1966. 3 I. Mitchell, P.: Vectorial chemistry and the molecular mechanism of chemiosmotic coupling: Power transmission by proticity. Biochem. SOC. Trans. 4:400, 1976. 32. Oxender, D. L., and Christensen, H. N.: Distinct mediating systems for the transport of neutral amino acids by the Ehrlich cell. J. Biol. Chem. 238:3686, 1963. 33. Pilla, A. A., and Margules, G. S.: Dynamic interfacial electrochemical phenomena at living cell membranes: Application to the toad urinary bladder membrane system. J. Electrochem. SOC. 124: 1697, 1977. 34. Romero-Sierra, C., and Tanner, J. A.: Biological effects of nonionizing radiation: An outline of fundamental laws. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 238:263, 1974. 35. Rowley, B. A., McKenna, J. M., Chase, G. R., and Wolcott, L. E.: The influence of electrical current on an infecting microorganism in wounds. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 238543, 1974. 36. Sansen, W., and De Dijcker, F.: The four-point probe technique to measure bio-impedances. Electromyogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 16:509, 1976. 37. Shamos, M. H., and Lavine, L. S.: Piezoelectricity as a fundamental property of biological tissues. Nature 213:267, 1967. 38. Spadaro, J. A.: Electrically stimulated bone growth in animals and man. Review of the literature. Clin. Orthop. 122:325, 1977. 39. Stan, S., Mulier, J. C., Sansen, W., and Dewaele, P.: Effect of direct current on the healing of fractures. In Burney, F., Herbst, E., and Hinsenkamp, M. (eds.): Electric Stimulation of Bone Growth and Repair. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, SpringerVerlag, 1978, pp. 47-53. 40. Van der Schueren, B., Doms, D., and De Loecker, W.: Storage damage in ratskin preserved at -3°C. Cryobiology 11526, 1974. 41. Witt, H. T., Schlodder, E., and Graber, P.: Membrane-bound ATP synthesis generated by an external electrical field. FEBS Lett. 69:272, 1976. 42. Wolcott, L. E., Wheeler, P. C., Hardwicke, H. M., and Rowley, B.: Accelerated healing of skin ulcers by electrotherapy: Preliminary clinical results. South. Med. J. 62:795, 1969. 43. Wu, K. T., Go, N., Dennis, C., Enquist, I., and Sawyer, P. N.: Effects of electric currents and interfacial potentials on wound healing. J. Surg. Res. 7:122, 1967.